But tests taking 1.48 longer to run on average!
Anything I should know about 3.6 and performance?

On 18 November 2016 at 22:42, Luca Sbardella <luca.sbardella@gmail.com> wrote:
Pulsar's tests are now run against 3.6-dev and all passing.
Nice!
Getting used to the C Future ;-)

On 13 October 2016 at 06:37, INADA Naoki <songofacandy@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks, Ben.

Both are very helpful information!

On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Ben Darnell <ben@bendarnell.com> wrote:
> [+async-sig@python.org, which is the new home for these kinds of
> discussions]
>
> Tornado's tests are now failing on nightly with "TypeError: can't send
> non-None value to a FutureIter":
> https://travis-ci.org/tornadoweb/tornado/jobs/167252979
>
> -Ben
>
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 3:55 PM INADA Naoki <songofacandy@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > If you have asyncio based project, and it uses Travis-CI,
>>
>> > please add "nightly" to your .travis.cnf [2].
>>
>> >
>>
>> > [2]
>>
>> >
>> > https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/languages/python/#Choosing-Python-versions-to-test-against
>>
>>
>>
>> Travis changed the "nightly" version to 3.7
>>
>> Now "3.6-dev" is for Python 3.6beta (Still 3.6b1, it may be upgraded
>> soon).
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> INADA Naoki  <songofacandy@gmail.com>
>>
>



--
INADA Naoki  <songofacandy@gmail.com>



--



--
http://lucasbardella.com