![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/5c222946aec6c3eba59a7d35ec36ad66.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Just created an Issue for this: https://bugs.python.org/issue33530 On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 2:07 PM, twisteroid ambassador <twisteroid.ambassador@gmail.com> wrote:
Sure, I should be able to massage the code into asyncio. Probably will need substantial help on writing any tests, though.
On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 2:29 AM, Yury Selivanov <yselivanov@gmail.com> wrote:
On May 13, 2018, 9:35 AM -0400, Guido van Rossum <guido@python.org>, wrote:
Yury,
This looks like good work.Would it make sense to add this to asyncio in 3.8?
Yes, it is solid. I'd like to see this in asyncio; specifically, I suggest to add a keyword-only argument to loop.create_connection & asyncio.open_connection to use happy eyeballs (off by default). Exposing the "staggered_race()" helper function might also be a good idea, I'm just not super happy with the name.
Twistero, would you be interested in submitting a PR?
Yury