OK, I have checked the existing code and think that Google-style docstrings were used, see eg. here: https://github.com/bit-team/backintime/blob/87775c9cd78b74862f6192c07e278154... So I will write my docstrings with this style too (which I also think is easier to read in the code directly) until I get a veto... On Thu, 2022-09-29 at 06:57 +0000, c.buhtz@posteo.jp wrote:
Good question I had myself, too.
Am 28.09.2022 22:46 schrieb J. A.:
Which docstring style do we use in Bit? Google or RST/Sphinx or anything else? See: https://www.sphinx-doc.org/en/master/usage/extensions/napoleon.html
Technically our Sphinx use the napoleon extension. Looking into the doc strings it seems to me that most of them are using the Google style.
I'm fine with that. But I have to learn some details, e.g. referencing elements in other modules etc _______________________________________________ Bit-dev mailing list -- bit-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to bit-dev-leave@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/bit-dev.python.org/ Member address: python@altfeld-im.de