Oct. 23, 2022
9:49 a.m.
Hi, On Sun, Oct 23, 2022 at 01:19:16PM +0000, c.buhtz@posteo.jp wrote:
One approach would be to modify the test that way that it still checks for the existence of that INFO lines but ignore the other lines. What do you think?
I think that kind of defeats the purpose of the test ;) We want to know if anything happens that isn't "the usual". But we might modify the test so that it specifically ignores the DBus warning, because that's out of scope for that test. Michael