"Full system backup"?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/412c7/412c7c65d20285155f529c2cd0e5b65d66121701" alt=""
Hello, does anyone know about a feature called "Full system backup"? I found something about it in the code: https://github.com/bit-team/backintime/blob/b578fc595dbe55288b709691eb26250b... But I can't find it in the GUI, even not as root. Kind Christian
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d123f/d123fc9bd3b635253d39f13288bf8f0098d68904" alt=""
It's a feature that never really materialized, it was introduced (I think) in early 2016: https://github.com/bit-team/backintime/blob/b578fc595dbe55288b709691eb26250b... … but then hidden again in late 2016: https://github.com/bit-team/backintime/commit/dfbd4bb17c1b312a8a21c258096ddf... Cheers Michael On 07.09.2023 17:09, c.buhtz@posteo.jp wrote:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/412c7/412c7c65d20285155f529c2cd0e5b65d66121701" alt=""
On 2023-09-07 18:07 Michael Büker <foss@michael-bueker.de> wrote:
Ah, I see. I don't see that someone will finish the implementation and testing in the near future. But I also don't want to forget this feature or the code. My proposal is to conserve the code in an issue. After that we can remove that currently "dead" code from the code base until someone pick it up again. What you all think?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d123f/d123fc9bd3b635253d39f13288bf8f0098d68904" alt=""
It's a feature that never really materialized, it was introduced (I think) in early 2016: https://github.com/bit-team/backintime/blob/b578fc595dbe55288b709691eb26250b... … but then hidden again in late 2016: https://github.com/bit-team/backintime/commit/dfbd4bb17c1b312a8a21c258096ddf... Cheers Michael On 07.09.2023 17:09, c.buhtz@posteo.jp wrote:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/412c7/412c7c65d20285155f529c2cd0e5b65d66121701" alt=""
On 2023-09-07 18:07 Michael Büker <foss@michael-bueker.de> wrote:
Ah, I see. I don't see that someone will finish the implementation and testing in the near future. But I also don't want to forget this feature or the code. My proposal is to conserve the code in an issue. After that we can remove that currently "dead" code from the code base until someone pick it up again. What you all think?
participants (4)
-
BiT dev
-
c.buhtz@posteo.jp
-
Lyla Watts
-
Michael Büker