Release Candidate for Back In Time 1.5.3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/412c7/412c7c65d20285155f529c2cd0e5b65d66121701" alt=""
Hello, I am happy to announce a new Release Candidate in preparation for the Back In Time release version 1.5.3. Please report back if you use it, even if no issues are found. <https://github.com/bit-team/backintime/releases/tag/v1.5.3-rc1> Changes: - Extensive code refactoring. - Added support for FCron. - Improved text labels in the graphical interface. - User manual updated. - Serbian language now available in both Latin and Cyrillic scripts. - New language: Interlingua (Occidental). - Minimum supported Python version raised to 3.9. - Removed dependency on libnotify-bin; now using DBus for notifications. We encourage everyone to test this Release Candidate, as it helps ensure a higher-quality final release. Without testing and feedback, creating an RC would be pointless. Your input is essential to improving the project! Thank you very much for support! Christian Buhtz
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/412c7/412c7c65d20285155f529c2cd0e5b65d66121701" alt=""
Two issues where discovered in RC 1 and fixed. They where related to packaging issues in context of GNU/Linux distributions. Still missing are some user tests. I did not received any message of someone using/testing the RC, no matter that in this version each user is greeted by a message window explaining the RC and requesting feedback. I still wonder if it make sense to create an RC before every release. What do you think?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d123f/d123fc9bd3b635253d39f13288bf8f0098d68904" alt=""
I think it makes sense because an RC release is likely to be picked up by some "daredevil" distro packagers like Arch, and then we have a better chance of learning about bugs. It will not see widespread usage, but it's better than having to release a hotfix after a full release. Cheers Michael On 01.11.2024 08:56, Christian Buhtz wrote:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/412c7/412c7c65d20285155f529c2cd0e5b65d66121701" alt=""
Two issues where discovered in RC 1 and fixed. They where related to packaging issues in context of GNU/Linux distributions. Still missing are some user tests. I did not received any message of someone using/testing the RC, no matter that in this version each user is greeted by a message window explaining the RC and requesting feedback. I still wonder if it make sense to create an RC before every release. What do you think?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d123f/d123fc9bd3b635253d39f13288bf8f0098d68904" alt=""
I think it makes sense because an RC release is likely to be picked up by some "daredevil" distro packagers like Arch, and then we have a better chance of learning about bugs. It will not see widespread usage, but it's better than having to release a hotfix after a full release. Cheers Michael On 01.11.2024 08:56, Christian Buhtz wrote:
participants (3)
-
c.buhtz@posteo.jp
-
Christian Buhtz
-
Michael Büker