Hi everyone,
A few days ago, there was a thread where a member brought up the code
of conduct to another member. In particular, as this list is provided
by the Python Software Foundation, we are observing the PSF Code of
Conduct. We are all expected to observe the code of conduct and I
would expect that people would feel safe raising violations of the
code of conduct. Furthermore, people shouldn't feel as if being asked
to observe the Code of Conduct is a threat or a violation of the Code
of Conduct.
The Code of Conduct exists to ensure that everyone feels safe
participating in this community. Granted, it's not a particularly
active community but it should be capable of representing the global
Python community.
If having to observe the Code of Conduct offends you or makes you feel
personally unsafe, perhaps you need to think long and hard about why
that is. If you think that you can't abide by the Code of Conduct, you
are not required to continue to subscribe to this list or participate
in its discussions.
To be clear, I have no intention to litigate the interaction from a
few days ago. No complaint seems to have been made. Further, there's
no intent to entertain discussion of moving this list off of PSF
infrastructure to bypass a Code of Conduct as any list with me as a
moderator or administrator will require a CoC.
Cheers,
Ian
I want to know the correct setting within Pylint if one wants to include
a module to be linted; I’m hoping it is this setting ?
# List of plugins (as comma separated values of python modules names) to
load, # usually to register additional checkers. load-plugins=
Thank You
Christopher
This is a minor thing, but it is puzzling. Here is a code fragment from
a project I'm working on:
> for device_id in job.devices:
> device = job.devices[device_id]
> <loop>
> del device_id
> del device
When I run pylint (version 1.6.5, astroid 1.4.9) against this code, I
get one warning diagnostic:
> Using possibly undefined loop variable 'device_id' (undefined-loop-variable)
Experimenting with Python 2, the loop variable is indeed in the name
space of the function I'm running. I get the same result with Python 3,
the loop variable is indeed in the function namespace.
The reason I'm using 'del' is to avoid name collisions on other sections
of code being written at different times -- this project has gone two
months already.
My "workaround" is to remove the del statement for the loop variable,
and leaving the rest of the del statements in for variables inside the
loop that (being a ex PL/1 programmer) I would assume would be out of
scope, but aren't.
I may move this loop into a separate function, and remove the need for
the del statements.
Comments?
This is a minor thing, but it is puzzling. Here is a code fragment from
a project I'm working on:
> for device_id in job.devices:
> device = job.devices[device_id]
> <loop>
> del device_id
> del device
When I run pylint (version 1.6.5, astroid 1.4.9) against this code, I
get one warning diagnostic:
> Using possibly undefined loop variable 'device_id' (undefined-loop-variable)
Experimenting with Python 2, the loop variable is indeed in the name
space of the function I'm running. I get the same result with Python 3,
the loop variable is indeed in the function namespace.
The reason I'm using 'del' is to avoid name collisions on other sections
of code being written at different times -- this project has gone two
months already.
My "workaround" is to remove the del statement for the loop variable,
and leaving the rest of the del statements in for variables inside the
loop that (being a ex PL/1 programmer) I would assume would be out of
scope, but aren't.
I may move this loop into a separate function, and remove the need for
the del statements.
Comments?
Hi folks,
I am looking for some tool (or algorithm which I can implement at the worst)
which calculates similarities between strings. I would turn this into a pylint
plugin b/c this is how I would consume it in my projects.
My background is that we've identified *duplicate* or *similar* strings in our
project which are marked for translation. Some of these are upper case vs. lower
case and all of the variations between (I can lower case everything before
sending to the tool of course), variances in spelling, e.g. "test case" vs
"TestCase", variations into how certain words/combination of words are used
together in a sentence, e.g. "user does not exist" vs. "the user specified was
not found".
Ideally I'd like to consume this tool in CI and based on the results reduce the
number of source strings needed for translation and make life for translators
easier.
Feel free to propose anything, I have not done any research on this topic.
Thanks,
Alex
