sorry i think this is an steryl discussion.
1. I see this video before and i never say that my quality index is ONLY
style. (and also all your recomendation are already inside the another
parts of the equation)
I am not offended or angry, but because how the (F%$$#%) scientific
publication works i can't tell you everything about the research before
the journal make their decision about it.
tanks for the comments.
PS: i gonna free the dataset in the near future.
On Sun, 12 Jun 2016 at 17:18 Ian Cordasco
as i say before, i am no interested in how is a quality of a project
On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 2:00 PM, Juan BC
wrote: based on the tolerance of their own community.
You didn't say that actually.
Mi interest is the quality based on a random sample of code from a random sample of programmers. I use flake because my index of quality is based also on flake8.
I think you need to watch https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wf-BqAjZb8M
Following the letter of the document isn't following the spirit and the quality of a code base can be measured on far more than one axis. Quality of a code base should also be determined by whether it uses obvious security problems (as can be caught via bandit) and other logical errors (as can be caught by pylint). Quality can be further measured by the tests a project has.
I urge you to reconsider how you're measuring "quality". Instead of calling it quality, please consider calling it "style conformance". They are very different things.
-- Juan BC (from phone)