On Sun, 8 May 2016 at 16:33 Senthil Kumaran <senthil@uthcode.com> wrote:
Hi Martin, Brett:

On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 10:38 AM, Brett Cannon <brett@python.org> wrote:
$ git rev-list --count master
489

I don’t know what the equivalent command in Mercurial is. Perhaps you
could clone the relevant branch to a fresh repository and check the
numerical revision number.

SO to the rescue (and Martin is right about how to figure it out): http://stackoverflow.com/questions/16672788/total-count-of-change-sets-for-mercurial-and-git

Senthil has also suggested verifying the hashes of all the files in a repository that are not in .hg or .git directories.

Are these validations enough for our purposes? 

Don't know, but it's at least a start.
 

Two files in the different version-control system can have same SHA and same commit of commits, but have a possibility of changesets/diffs associated with those commits different. I was thinking, how we should go about with this when evaluating the existing git repo.

When we do migration afresh using a tool like hg-git, we assume that this verification step is asserted as part of unit tests of the tool.

That would be my hope. It obviously doesn't hurt to check, though, if it isn't too difficult.

-Brett
 

-- 
Senthil