[core-workflow] Re: Adding some concrete examples to the NEWS entry guide?

"Patch by" was useful with Mercurial which didn't allow to store an author and a committer. Git now stores the author and the committer: vstinner@apu$ git show --pretty=full 5b48dc638b7405fd9bde4d854bf477dfeaaddf44 --stat commit 5b48dc638b7405fd9bde4d854bf477dfeaaddf44 Author: Jonas Haag Commit: Antoine Pitrou I'm not sure about added *manually* the author in the NEWS entry. I would prefer to have a generated page like https://thanks.rust-lang.org/ to limit the work of the reviewer (and of the author). My intent is not to hide the author of a contributor, but make contributions as simple as possible in Python, and to better "scale" our workflow. What do you think? Victor 2017-11-26 17:08 GMT+01:00 Mariatta Wijaya :

+1.

Related question: Should the news entry include "Patch by <name>?". I noticed some entries have this, some don't. Is there a rule?

Thanks.

_______________________________________________ core-workflow mailing list -- core-workflow@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to core-workflow-leave@python.org https://mail.python.org/mm3/mailman3/lists/core-workflow.python.org/ This list is governed by the PSF Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct