Hi Brett,YES! That's exactly what we want to do. :D
On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 1:58 AM Brett Cannon <brett@python.org> wrote:Are you thinking something that adds checks to the PR or comments w/ proposed fixes?On Wed, Jun 5, 2019 at 8:39 PM Chen KunYu <xspiritualx@gmail.com> wrote:_______________________________________________Hi,
Recently, tirkarthi (xtreak) works on finding and fixing typos.
And I (18z) came up with the idea of creating a spellcheck bot to improve the quality of cpython.
We had discussion in https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/13749
And it is summarized below:
Consensus:
Reducing typo in a constructive way.
To be Solved:
Even after reducing the code checked, there will still be mostly false positives.
High frequency of updating dictionary.txt (false positive typo).
Next Step:
Interfacing the filter with aspell to get some numbers.
MISC:
The report could be made optional with a spellcheck label.
Code for reducing .py files to strings and comments.
Command line for spellcheck.
There are problems to be solved.
But I think we can always find a better solution.
So, I’ll be working on interfacing the filter with aspell to get some numbers.
Looking forward to hearing more opinions. :D
Thanks
KunYuChen (18z)
core-workflow mailing list -- core-workflow@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to core-workflow-leave@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/core-workflow.python.org/
This list is governed by the PSF Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct