On Sat, 6 Feb 2016 at 10:25 Ezio Melotti wrote:

On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 4:01 AM, Brett Cannon wrote:

...

https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0512/#adding-github-username-support-to-...

...

In order for the CLA bot to work, I need people to be able to add their GitHub usernames to their bugs.python.org profile. I also need some

API(s)

...

that I can hit from the bot that lets me pass in a GitHub username -- or names, since there can be more than one, but I'm also fine making multiple individual requests instead of multiple names in a single request -- and get back some kind of signed/not signed/no GitHub username response (can even be GitHub username -> b.p.o username in one call and then b.p.o CLA status as another if that's easier).

I'm not sure if Ezio was planning to own this or not, so I'm asking if anyone wants to take this on or help Ezio with the work if he does want to lead it (or R. David if he wants to lead it).

Adding this should be relatively easy -- the new field must be added to the schema and a few extra lines in the templates should be added as well to allow users to add/edit/see it. Testing it is a bit more difficult though. For the API, we can add a temporary page to retrieve the git user name as json or wait until I finish reviewing and merging the REST API patch (any help on this is more than welcome). I'm trying to set up a docker container with a test instance of the tracker and create a few test issues/users, so that I can test things more conveniently. It might also be useful to make a psf account on dockerhub (or somewhere else) where to keep this and possibly other containers.

IOW if people want to help in a way that involves coding, then please help Ezio with b.p.o stuff. This is also beneficial long-term for maintaining the issue tracker and changes that will be needed in the future for getting cpython moved over. As for a PSF account on dockerhub, I would ask the PSF infra team what they think and have them administer it.

On Sun, Feb 7, 2016 at 8:24 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:

On 7 February 2016 at 05:22, Brett Cannon wrote:

...

IOW if people want to help in a way that involves coding, then please help Ezio with b.p.o stuff. This is also beneficial long-term for maintaining the issue tracker and changes that will be needed in the future for getting cpython moved over.

As for a PSF account on dockerhub, I would ask the PSF infra team what they think and have them administer it.

A PSF account on DockerHub sounds like a good idea to me - that would likely also be useful for hosting the reference image for the manylinux1 build environment.

Cheers, Nick.

-- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia _______________________________________________ core-workflow mailing list core-workflow@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/core-workflow This list is governed by the PSF Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct

Ezio I followed the steps you've sent me yesterday, and I was able to cleanly setup my roundup instance. I've made slight changes, cleaned up the structure and added readme and makefile. My fork is under (branch dev): https://github.com/soltysh/docker-b.p.o/tree/dev I should start working on adding the new field later today. Will keep you informed about the progress. Maciej