Mailman 3 September 2006 - Cplusplus-sig

Lost Again! :)
by Nicolas Tessore Sept. 1, 2006

Sept. 1, 2006

Hello, thanks to your helpful replies, I think I got one step closer to understanding how Py++ should work :) I built a python script that dynamically creates a header file including all the libraries from one folder. Fortunately, each class is contained in one single header called <classname>.h, so that creating the template typedefs and instantiations work fine. Now my understanding is still lacking with respect to template functions: I followed the howto-advise and call every function once for instantiation. This works, however I need to control the name that function later has in Python. At the moment I use function pointers (I could not find something like typedef), but they don't seem to make their way into the Boost.Python binding file. --- Now something from my tests: I noticed I often get a error like super(type, obj): obj must be instance or subtype of type. from a condition in decl_wrappers/calldef_wrapper.py (line 309). However, running your GUI utility for a test, this error never occurs. What is my mistake? --- Another problem arises when I try to build an example I created for my lib: I always run into 'boost::python::init' : too many template arguments errors. I had no time to dive deeper into Boost.Python, anyone up for a quick heads-up? --- This is all :D I really appreciate your efforts in helping out, and I am confident Py++ results will soon overtake Swig and pay off the time invested. Regards, N.

2 10

boost python mingw binaries
by Jorge Vargas Sept. 1, 2006

Sept. 1, 2006

hi does anyone plans on distributing binaries for boost_python under windows? I have try to compile it myself many times and fail. Boost and Boost Jam is something new for me, the docs for boost_python are inclined to someone that knows boost and the ones of boost itself have no leads to what to do if something goes wrong. I'm not a windows dev I just want to give an alternative here so all I need is the binary since my only goal here is to make Democracy player compile with free tools on windows. so does anyone has boost python as a binary that works under mingw?

2 3

boost:python::arg and default value
by Roman Yakovenko Sept. 1, 2006

Sept. 1, 2006

Hi. I want to resolve the issue discussed in this thread: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.c++/9878/focus=9881 The short version of the discussion is: class Foo; class Foo2 { friend class Foo; Foo2(Foo *f=0); }; class Foo { Foo(Foo2 *f=0); }; It is not possible to expose both Foo and Foo2 constructors with default values, without usage of some tricks. The main problem is that, when Boost.Python initializes boost::python::arg, it requires type of default value to be registered. I had some free time and took a look on the code. I think, I understand what is going on and how to fix the situation, but still need some help here and there. I see only one possible solution - to add to Boost.Python functionality, that will allow user to control argument default value conversion time. Today, the default value converted to Python during function registration. This happens in boost::python::objects::function class constructor. Solution: 1. To add classes that will define C++ to Python convert time. struct converter_base{ virtual handle<> py_value() const = 0; //const in interface is a hack, objects::function::call member function //has const modifier }; struct default_converter : converter_base{ converts value in the constructor and saves the value in a member variable py_value returns the member variable }; struct on_first_use_converter : converter_base{ saves the C++ value as member variable py_value will convert C++ value to Python on first invocation, will save the result in member variable, after this, it will always return the member variable. }; 2. Change in keyword struct. Today keyword struct keeps function default value as instance of handle<>. This should be changed. keyword struct should keep shared_ptr to coverter_base class instance or it should keep empty shared_ptr. Thus it will be possible to control C++ to Python default value conversion time from objects::function class. 3. There are few changes, that should be done to boost::python::objects::function class. This is the place I have lack of knowledge and the code is a little bit complex and fragile. More over, every additional logic, that will be added here will downgrade performance. There are few changed that should be done to the class. 1. The class should keep all keywords, that has default value converter other than default_converter. It also should save keyword position. 2. In constructor, when we register function keyword arguments, we should skip initialization of default value, for converters other than default_converter. 3. Now, the only change left is to modify function::call method. Unfortunately I can not write the working code - lack of knowledge( or sleep ). I'll be glad, if somebody can help me here. The main problem, is that some how I should pass to the function default values and I don't exactly understand how I should do that. I attached the modified files. What do you think about those changes? -- Roman Yakovenko C++ Python language binding http://www.language-binding.net/

2 3