[C++-sig] Re: Re: implicitly_convertible and char*

Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve wrote:

I don't really feel competent in this matter, but I believe char const* and const char* are two different things. Did you try it with "const char*"?

Nope. That's the same (read from right to left). Different things is ...* const (constant pointer itself). Mike PS. only ddd afaik treat them differently ;)