When the Singleton class is linked, the DLL will get the Singleton::_instance as an unique static variable.<br>Well, In my last attempt, it appeared to be like that. <br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 5:33 PM, John Reid <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:j.reid@mail.cryst.bbk.ac.uk">j.reid@mail.cryst.bbk.ac.uk</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div class="Ih2E3d">ZaeX wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
&nbsp;And in my opinion, you&#39;d better be careful if you expect that the c++ code and python code are using the same singleton instance.<br>
Because there&#39;re two Singleton::_instance if you export the Singleton class to Python. one at c++ side, the other at python side.<br>
</blockquote></div>
I don&#39;t think this is true. What makes you think this?<br><font color="#888888">
<br>
John.</font><div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c"><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Cplusplus-sig mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Cplusplus-sig@python.org" target="_blank">Cplusplus-sig@python.org</a><br>
<a href="http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cplusplus-sig" target="_blank">http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cplusplus-sig</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Time is mana, we must hurry<br>