Roman Yakovenko <roman.yakovenko@gmail.com> writes:
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Roman Yakovenko <roman.yakovenko@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks. I will try to fix the problems you reported this evening and will let you know.
Nikolaus, I fixed both issues you reported: * http://pygccxml.svn.sourceforge.net/pygccxml/?rev=1784&view=rev * http://pygccxml.svn.sourceforge.net/pygccxml/?rev=1785&view=rev
Hi, Thanks for looking into this. I'm afraid the fix for the CFUNCTYPE vs POINTER(CFUNCTYPE) issue is not completely working though. The small testcase that I send around indeed generates correct code with the new version. However, if you try the same code on a more complex header (like the attached one, needs fuse headers to be installed) it still produces the wrong result: fuse_lowlevel_ops._fields_ = [ #class fuse_lowlevel_ops ("init", ctypes.POINTER( ctypes.CFUNCTYPE( None, ctypes.c_void_p, ctypes.POINTER( fuse_conn_info ) ) )), ("destroy", ctypes.POINTER( ctypes.CFUNCTYPE( None, ctypes.c_void_p ) )), [...] Best, -Nikolaus -- »Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a Banana.« PGP fingerprint: 5B93 61F8 4EA2 E279 ABF6 02CF A9AD B7F8 AE4E 425C