Aug. 3, 2005
4:12 p.m.
On Wed, 03 Aug 2005 11:01:41 -0400, David Abrahams <dave@boost-consulting.com> said:
I'm pretty sure that's an unrelated problem, and something you did is corrupting memory somewhere.
Thanks for the tip. I found that a function object created not by clone method also has the same problem. This used to work, so indeed I have some other problem.
I"m not sure about this invert_ownership business. Are you sure you're not allowing your Python object to be destroyed prematurely?
Pretty sure. The C++ code just create a new instance and is about to use it. Thanks again.