July 9, 2004
12:38 p.m.
Dusty Leary <dleary@gmail.com> writes:
I guess I'm being a pain, but I still have my same problem.
To recap:
I write saying that implicitly_convertible<X, char*> doesn't work. Dave responds saying that char* is not a valid C++ string, that char const * should work. I amend my example to show that char const * does not work. Thread gets a little sidetracked with "const char*" vs "char const *" ...Limbo
Sorry, I just don't think I have time to look into the problem right now :( -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com