Francois Ostiguy <ostiguy@fnal.gov> writes:
Hi -
I recently experimented with the new "staticmethod" attribute to wrap static class methods. I works beautifully ... great work !
Thanks go mostly to Nikolay Mladenov, who contributed it.
This leads me to ask: is there any existing/planned equally convenient way to wrap static class variables ?
See http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Mail/Message/1547542, though I am now favoring option 2 at the end of that message over option 1. I don't have a plan to implement it soon unless someone hires me to do it, just because I have a lot on my plate already... but someone else may want to do it.
I am thinking of something along the lines of
struct MyClass { double value1; double value2;
I assume you meant to add a static data member called 'value' here??
}
python::class_<MyClass>("MyClass") .def_readwrite("value2", &MyClass::value) .staticvariable("value2"); <<<<<< ?????????
That syntax would not be neccessary; it would be enough to write: python::class_<MyClass>("MyClass") .def_readwrite("value2", &MyClass::value) ; ...since &MyClass::value is not a data member pointer, but a simple object pointer and thus we can deduce that it should act like a static data member. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com