Actually, this seems like a pretty reasonable SciPy feature request. Feel free to open an issue there. Thanks, Ian Henriksen On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 3:18 PM 'Chris Barker' via cython-users < cython-users@googlegroups.com> wrote:
BTW,
Please don't spam so many lists with the same question. cython-users is the right one for this.
-CHB
On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 10:50 AM, Chris Barker <chris.barker@noaa.gov> wrote:
On Sun, Jul 29, 2018 at 6:17 PM, Eleftherios Garyfallidis < garyfallidis@gmail.com> wrote:
For a project in DIPY (http://dipy.org) we need to be calling 1D and 2D FFTs and iFFTs very often. For this reason the most efficient way seems to be through Cython.
It would be great if we could call scipy's fft or numpy's fft without the overhead.
have you profiled the overhead? Is it really significant? I"d expect the answer would only be yes if you were doing a lot of really small arrays -- is that the case?
-CHB
--
Christopher Barker, Ph.D. Oceanographer
Emergency Response Division NOAA/NOS/OR&R (206) 526-6959 voice 7600 Sand Point Way NE <https://maps.google.com/?q=7600+Sand+Point+Way+NE&entry=gmail&source=g> (206) 526-6329 fax Seattle, WA 98115 (206) 526-6317 main reception
Chris.Barker@noaa.gov
--
Christopher Barker, Ph.D. Oceanographer
Emergency Response Division NOAA/NOS/OR&R (206) 526-6959 voice 7600 Sand Point Way NE <https://maps.google.com/?q=7600+Sand+Point+Way+NE&entry=gmail&source=g> (206) 526-6329 fax Seattle, WA 98115 (206) 526-6317 main reception
Chris.Barker@noaa.gov
--
--- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cython-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cython-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.