Mailman 3 July 2016 - Datetime-SIG

Re: [Datetime-SIG] Add tzinfo= argument to datetime.combine
by Alexander Belopolsky 01 Aug '16

01 Aug '16

On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 4:43 PM, Guido van Rossum <guido(a)python.org> wrote: > Sounds good to me. Thanks for a quick response. I've posted a patch at < http://bugs.python.org/issue27661>.

1 0

Re: [Datetime-SIG] Add tzinfo= argument to datetime.combine
by Guido van Rossum 01 Aug '16

01 Aug '16

Sounds good to me. --Guido (mobile) On Jul 31, 2016 9:45 AM, "Alexander Belopolsky" < alexander.belopolsky(a)gmail.com> wrote: > I would like to propose a small new feature: add an optional tzinfo > argument to datetime.combine() so that > > datetime.combine(d, t, info) > > returns the same object as > > datetime.combine(d, t).replace(tzinfo=info) > > but without creating an intermediate naive instance. > > _______________________________________________ > Datetime-SIG mailing list > Datetime-SIG(a)python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/datetime-sig > The PSF Code of Conduct applies to this mailing list: > https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ >

1 0

Add tzinfo= argument to datetime.combine
by Alexander Belopolsky 01 Aug '16

01 Aug '16

I would like to propose a small new feature: add an optional tzinfo argument to datetime.combine() so that datetime.combine(d, t, info) returns the same object as datetime.combine(d, t).replace(tzinfo=info) but without creating an intermediate naive instance.

1 0