Re: [Datetime-SIG] Calendar vs timespan calculations...
On 08/01/2015 11:18 AM, Alexander Belopolsky wrote:
On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Ethan Furman wrote:
I'm happy to concede that counting backwards to get the start time is less frequent, and the times this hits/crosses a time shift are even less frequent, but that is all the more reason to refuse the temptation to guess.
My goal here is to minimize the impact on the programs that are already written and deployed.
Why is this even a problem? Already written programs will not be using the new strict tzinfo. -- ~Ethan~
On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> wrote:
My goal here is to minimize the impact on the programs that are already written and deployed.
Why is this even a problem? Already written programs will not be using the new strict tzinfo.
They will if their tzinfo provider switches to tzstrict.
participants (2)
-
Alexander Belopolsky -
Ethan Furman