Distutils-SIG December 2005

distutils-sig@python.org

35 participants
60 discussions

setuptools site-package pollution
by Anthony Tarlano 10 Oct '06

10 Oct '06

Hi all.. Firstly, I would like to say thanks for the setuptools package, which I was introduced to after reading about the RuleDispatch package on the IBM developerworks charming python series. Oh btw. RuleDispatch is the most useful python package that I have seen in the last year in the python world, so thanks for that also ;) Now that the congrats and hugs are out of the way, I would like to ask a question. How can I tell setuptools not to put packages, such as dispatch, protocols, and setuptools, in a subdirectory named the same as the egg and to just put the package name. For example from pydoc I currently get: c:\python\lib\site-packages\ruledispatch-0.5a0.dev_r2100-py2.4-win32.egg dispatch (package) c:\python\lib\site-packages\pyprotocols-1.0a0dev_r2082-py2.4-win32.egg dispatch protocols (package) c:\python\lib\site-packages\setuptools-0.6a8-py2.4.egg easy_install pkg_resources setuptools (package) site what I would like to see is just: ..\site-packages dispatch (package) ..\site-packages protocols (package) ..\site-packages setuptools (package) Maybe it is just a pet-peeve, but I like to keep a nice tidy site-packages directory, and these long directory names just seem to me to be pollution of my site-packages directory in my command shell. If there is an option to have just the packages, I would really appreciate someone telling me what it is. If not maybe it could be considered, and to put whatever meta-data the directory names are providing somewhere else.. Thanks, Anthony

3 2

Re: [Distutils] Setuptools' goal in rpm/deb-based systems
by Phillip J. Eby 02 Jan '06

02 Jan '06

At 11:05 PM 12/29/2005 +0800, Jeff Pitman wrote: >I see that --single-version-externally-managed has been added as an >option so that .deb/.rpm packaging can take advantage of that relying >upon apt/yum/smart to take care of business. Hopefully, this will be >pushed out soon. FYI, unless there's some policy preventing it, you can use the current SVN snapshot as a basis for a Debian package of setuptools. If built from a source checkout, it will correctly include its Subversion revision number as part of its name, e.g. "0.6a9dev-r41780". In setuptools' version numbering, this is an *older* release than "0.6a9", so when the final 0.6a9 comes out it will replace the "dev" versions. I realize that this isn't necessarily the same thing as how Debian package versions work, but I assume it must have some facility for pre-release tags. If all else fails, you could treat it as "0.6a8-r41780" instead, which might be a more compatible numbering approach. At this point, the only thing left on my to-do list for 0.6a9 is more documentation for EasyInstall, so don't let that stop you from packaging it. The only reason to wait would be to see if anybody reports bugs with the current version, which probably won't happen until *after* 0.6a9 is released. :)

2 1

Re: [Distutils] Setuptools projects with '-' in their names (was Re: some kind of problem with setuptools 0.6a9)
by Phillip J. Eby 31 Dec '05

31 Dec '05

At 11:26 PM 12/31/2005 +0800, Jeff Pitman wrote: >What's ambiguous? Unless distutils allows `-' in Version, I believe Name >and Version can easily be extractable without transposition. Do you have a >specific example that's not obvious? The distutils allow *anything* in both name and version; the arguments aren't checked in any way. Take a quick skim through PyPI and see how many packages have a '-' in either the name or the version number. I don't know of any that do both. An obvious example: CherryPy 2.1.0-rc2 had a '-' in the version number. I know of at least one other project that uses '-rc' suffixes on its versions, though its name escapes my recall at the moment. There are also distutils projects that have numbers in their names - distinct from the actual version number.

1 0

Re: [Distutils] Setuptools projects with '-' in their names (was Re: some kind of problem with setuptools 0.6a9)
by Phillip J. Eby 31 Dec '05

31 Dec '05

At 04:35 PM 12/31/2005 +0800, Jeff Pitman wrote: >What's the purpose of transposition between `-' and `_'? -- -jeff The distutils put '-' between different parts of the filenames it generates. If dashes aren't escaped, it prevents the filename from being unambiguously parseable by a computer. As it is, when looking for source distributions or win32.exe files, EasyInstall has to treat filenames as having every possible ambiguous interpretation, since the distutils currently generate such ambiguous filenames for non-setuptools projects.

2 1

Re: [Distutils] Setuptools projects with '-' in their names (was Re: some kind of problem with setuptools 0.6a9)
by Phillip J. Eby 31 Dec '05

31 Dec '05

At 11:45 AM 12/31/2005 +0800, Jeff Pitman wrote: >There is a standard regular expression that can be used to split out N-V >which is a pretty common thing in deb/rpm. (ie. python-foo). I use the >following in some py scripts to manage these pairings for my rpm repo: >'(?i)(.*)-([^-]*)-(([^-]*)\.([^-]*)\.%s)(.*)' Which is N-V-R.dist.repo.ext >The form that you might want would be: '(.*)-([^-]*)' Name-Version This >would allow Name to have -. Obviously, - cannot be used in Version. Also, >two side notes, 1) it's kind of annoying that package names interchange >between `-' and `_', one in the file name of the archive and one used in >the extracted directory name. 2) I've also see the use of `_' in >versioning, such as json.py. I also highly discourage that practice. -- -jeff The format used by setuptools condenses non-alphanumeric runs to a single '-' in the project's actual name and version; these are then transposed to a '_' in filenames, with '-' to separate name parts. The canonical form is '-', but the .egg-info directory format previously didn't transpose it to '_'. This caused a problem when support for versioned .egg-info was added to support system packages. I didn't realize that the setup-directory .egg-info wasn't being translated. Anyway, this is fixed now in the SVN version; all of the other places in setuptools that worked with '-'/'_' filenames were using the same (correct) code to do the processing. The relevant .egg-info code, however, was different, because it needed to *not* include the version number, so it couldn't use the standard dist.egg_name() method to generate a properly escaped filename including the version, Python version, etc.

2 1

Undelivered Message
by postmaster＠renesas.com 31 Dec '05

31 Dec '05

The email was deleted by system policy. Attached file might be containing virus. Connection From: 127.0.0.1 From: distutils-sig(a)python.org To: stephen.clarke(a)superh.com, joern.rennecke(a)superh.com Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 17:28:04 +0900 Subject: hi, ive a new mail address --- Scan information follows --- Virus Name: W32.Sober.X@mm!zip File Attachment: mailtext.zip Attachment Status: infected Virus Name: W32.Sober.X@mm File Attachment: mailtext.zip/File-packed_dataInfo.exe Attachment Status: infected --- File name Block information follows --- File Attachment: mailtext.zip Matching file name: Message is considered to be a mass-mailer. The following text is Japanese. 添付ファイルにウィルスが含まれている可能性があるか、制限によりウィルス検知処理が中断された為、メールを削除致しました。

1 0

Setuptools projects with '-' in their names (was Re: some kind of problem with setuptools 0.6a9)
by Phillip J. Eby 31 Dec '05

31 Dec '05

At 10:04 AM 12/30/2005 -0500, Kevin Dangoor wrote: >The "tg-admin sql" command uses sqlobject which, in turn uses egg >metadata. Something I just noticed is that these commands are no >longer working on a project i have called "Wiki-20". They *used* to >work. Now they get a "DistributionNotFound" error for Wiki-20. >... >I had also tried to just do "pkg_resources.require("WIki-20")" from >the Python shell, but that didn't work either. This is new behavior >between a8 and a9. Let me know if there's anything else I can tell you >about the problem... Hi all. Due to the recent addition of versioned '.egg-info' support for system packages, you may have to rename any current '.egg-info' if your project name has a '-' in it. Otherwise, recent versions of setuptools will think the '-' is the separator between the project name and version number, leading to problems like the ones described by Kevin above. I've added code to the latest SVN setuptools to detect this problem and warn you about it, as well as tell you what you should rename the .egg-info directory to. If you have a '-' in your project's name, and you are using an 0.6a9dev version of setuptools, you should upgrade and rename the .egg-info directory. If you distribute any source releases of your project or have users tracking SVN or CVS releases of it, you *must* make your project require setuptools>=0.6a9dev_r41857, by passing it to ez_setup, e.g.:: from ez_setup import use_setuptools use_setuptools('0.6a9dev_r41857', 'http://some/dir/to/download/the/egg/from/') If you do not do this, and a user has an older version of setuptools, they will encounter problems. If you wait for the official release of 0.6a9 to upgrade, and you use its ez_setup.py or ez_setup/__init__.py, you can avoid having to change the setup script as shown. Again, all this applies only to projects with a '-' in their names, and only if *you* are upgrading from 0.6a8 to an 0.6a9 development or final release. Your project's users can upgrade to 0.6a9 without breakage, as there is a backward compatibility mode for everything but "setup.py develop" (which will refuse to run until the .egg-info directory has been renamed).

2 1

SuSE 10.0 & distutils
by cmire 30 Dec '05

30 Dec '05

I have SuSE 10.0 installed on my machine, and it comes with Python 2.4.1. I've been trying to build Zope on this box, and I'm getting an error that it can't find distutils.cmd. I did some digging, and it appears this is part of distutils.core, and according to the distutils download page, distutils should be already included with Python versions above 1.6. I checked where my system has Python installed, and it's at /usr/lib/python2.4. I did a find for that directory and all the subdirectories for anything distutils, and nothing came back. Is it just a straightforward thing to download the distutils tar file and install it, or since it wasn't included with my Python install (and should have been), is there anything special I should check or be aware of? Thanks, Charles Mire

2 1

default installs and plugins
by Ian Bicking 29 Dec '05

29 Dec '05

I'm still finding it impossible to use multiple versions of a package unless none of them show up in a .pth file (i.e., none are available without requiring), I get a VersionConflict. I think this may be because I iterate over entry points early on, then do a require later. Conversely, if I don't have a default version installed, I don't see any entry points while iterating until the package is required. I can kind of resolve this by adding a --require option to any command that uses plugins, but this feels like I'm going down the path of CLASSPATH-like command invocation. I'm not even sure what the resolution would or can be, except that it means that I don't see any way to reasonably use versioning and plugins together. This worries me, since I have lots of code that is both package and plugin, and if this is the situation then I'll have to move to non-root installs everywhere I want version isolation. (Which I actually suspect I'll have to do anyway, but I was hoping that things would at least be usable without it). -- Ian Bicking / ianb(a)colorstudy.com / http://blog.ianbicking.org

4 5

Re: [Distutils] Setuptools' goal in rpm/deb-based systems
by Phillip J. Eby 29 Dec '05

29 Dec '05

At 11:11 AM 12/29/2005 -0500, Kevin Dangoor wrote: >On 12/29/05, Jeff Pitman <jeff.pitman(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > So, they're plugins that extend tg-admin commands. In the .rpm/.deb > > space what would happen here is that these plugins would also be > > installed as .rpm/.deb. This is kind of like Twisted 2.0+ after the > > split. What would be good here is to have .eggs install into $HOME and > > tg-admin still pickup on them. > >If the system is set up correctly, the users could install the plugins >as .rpms/.debs *or* install the eggs to their $HOME. Either way should >work. By the way, what Jeff is asking for regarding $HOME is now a documented procedure in the EasyInstall documentation, known as an "Administrator Installation". See: http://peak.telecommunity.com/DevCenter/EasyInstall#custom-installation-loc… for more details.

1 0

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

Distutils-SIG December 2005