Hi,
I've just registered 'copad' module with CheeseShop and tried to use
easy_install to test but unsuccessful... witht he following error...
ML-iB:/sw/lib/python2.5/site-packages mauriceling$ sudo easy_install copads
Searching for copads
Reading http://pypi.python.org/simple/copads/
Reading http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/copads
No local packages or download links found for copads
error: Could not find suitable distribution for Requirement.parse('copads')
Here is my setup.py
from ez_setup import use_setuptools
use_setuptools()
from setuptools import setup, find_packages
setup(name='copads',
version='0.1',
description='Collection of Python Algorithms and Data Structures',
long_description='Collection of Python Algorithms and Data Structures',
author='Maurice HT Ling',
author_email='mauriceling(a)acm.org',
url='http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/copads',
license = 'GNU General Public License version 2',
platform = 'OS independent',
package_dir = {'copads' : 'src',
'copads.test' : 'test'},
packages = ['copads', 'copads.test'],
classifiers=['Development Status :: 3 - Alpha',
'Intended Audience :: Developers',
'License :: OSI Approved :: GNU General Public License
(GPL)',
'Operating System :: OS Independent',
'Programming Language :: Python',
'Topic :: Scientific/Engineering :: Artificial
Intelligence',
'Topic :: Scientific/Engineering :: Mathematics',
'Topic :: Software Development :: Libraries :: Python
Modules'
],
)
Any suggestions?
Thanks
ML
--
Maurice LING, BSc(Hons)(Biochem), BSc(Comp), FIFA, MACM
Lecturer, Chemical and Life Sciences, Singapore Polytechnic
Co-Editor-in-Chief, The Python Papers Anthology
Firebird Foundation Committee Member
Secretary, University of Melbourne Alumni Association (Singapore)
mobile: +6596669233, +6568707927
resume: http://maurice.vodien.com/maurice_resume.pdf
www: http://maurice.vodien.com
At 02:06 PM 2/19/2009 +0000, Karsten Petersen wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I'm trying to make Google App Engine work smoothly with setuptools
>and I'm struggling to understand one specific piece of what
>pkg_resources does. Would you mind giving me a hint?
>
>The question is basically: Why does _handle_ns() in pkg_resources
>import other modules that implement the same namespace. It's not
>using the module handle that is returned. I looked for side effects
>but the only ones I found was that exceptions are raised if the
>other modules are broken and that the modules __file__ var is
>changed to point to the last found module that implements the
>namespace in question.
>
>What am I missing?
In the unlikely event that one of the __init__.py's contains anything
other than namespace setup code, loading the module ensures that it
will be run. This was done for compatibility with older packages
that use distutils hacks to create a namespace package. (i.e.,
shipping one package with the __init__.py, and the rest without
it). Such packages need to have their __init__.py code run.
It probably won't hurt anything too badly to leave it out, since it's
strictly for compatibility with a configuration that's deprecated
anyway. (At least, it's deprecated for setuptools.)
Hi,
I've just registered 'copad' module with CheeseShop and tried to use
easy_install to test but unsuccessful... witht he following error...
ML-iB:/sw/lib/python2.5/site-packages mauriceling$ sudo easy_install copads
Searching for copads
Reading http://pypi.python.org/simple/copads/
Reading http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/copads
No local packages or download links found for copads
error: Could not find suitable distribution for Requirement.parse('copads')
Here is my setup.py
from ez_setup import use_setuptools
use_setuptools()
from setuptools import setup, find_packages
setup(name='copads',
version='0.1',
description='Collection of Python Algorithms and Data Structures',
long_description='Collection of Python Algorithms and Data
Structures',
author='Maurice HT Ling',
author_email='mauriceling(a)acm.org',
url='http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/copads',
license = 'GNU General Public License version 2',
platform = 'OS independent',
package_dir = {'copads' : 'src',
'copads.test' : 'test'},
packages = ['copads', 'copads.test'],
classifiers=['Development Status :: 3 - Alpha',
'Intended Audience :: Developers',
'License :: OSI Approved :: GNU General Public License
(GPL)',
'Operating System :: OS Independent',
'Programming Language :: Python',
'Topic :: Scientific/Engineering :: Artificial
Intelligence',
'Topic :: Scientific/Engineering :: Mathematics',
'Topic :: Software Development :: Libraries :: Python
Modules'
],
)
Any suggestions?
Thanks
ML
--
Maurice LING, BSc(Hons)(Biochem), BSc(Comp), FIFA, MACM
Lecturer, Chemical and Life Sciences, Singapore Polytechnic
Co-Editor-in-Chief, The Python Papers Anthology
Firebird Foundation Committee Member
Secretary, University of Melbourne Alumni Association (Singapore)
mobile: +6596669233, +6568707927
resume: http://maurice.vodien.com/maurice_resume.pdf
www: http://maurice.vodien.com
Hot on the heels of stdeb 0.2.2 comes 0.2.3. More fantastic features for
this Python-package-to-debian-package automator, you ask? Only one, a
--ignore-install-requires option added by Brett (last name unknown).
More importantly, however, are a couple bugfixes from Brett and Zooko
O'Whielacronx for the new --autofind-depends option.
Get it while it, and your new Lenny installation, are hot. (It also
works for Ubuntu.)
The homepage: http://github.com/astraw/stdeb
Download: http://pypi.python.org/pypi/stdeb/0.2.3
-Andrew
Hi All,
As a result of the Debian 5.0 release, psycopg2 needs to be recompiled
to use the new shared library:
import psycopg2 as psycopg
File "build/bdist.linux-i686/egg/psycopg2/__init__.py", line 60, in
<module>
File "build/bdist.linux-i686/egg/psycopg2/_psycopg.py", line 7, in
<module>
File "build/bdist.linux-i686/egg/psycopg2/_psycopg.py", line 6, in
__bootstrap__
ImportError: libpq.so.4: cannot open shared object file: No such file or
directory
How do I tell buildout to recompile this egg?
cheers,
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
I've been looking at the spec file that 'bdist_rpm' generates and I do
not see a %config or %config(noreplace) section. Is there a way to
generate a %config section and specify a list of files? This is
important so that config files do not get overwritten when using 'rpm -U'.
Hi,
I started to write a detailed description of the uninstall feature
based on the previous threads we had, and there are two points I'd
like to
discuss:
1. should the uninstall command be part of the Python interpreter itself ?
for instance, be callable like this :
$ python -r MyPackage
or :
$ python --remove-package MyPackage
2. If we add an uninstall command, it makes sense to me to add an
install command as well, at
the same level.
maybe :
$ python -a MyPackage
or :
$ python --add-package MyPackage
Regards
Tarek
--
Tarek Ziadé | Association AfPy | www.afpy.org
Blog FR | http://programmation-python.org
Blog EN | http://tarekziade.wordpress.com/
Hello,
Right now Distutils will let you add the name of the maintainer and
the name of the author as two distinct metadata in your package.
When creating the PKG-INFO, Distutils includes an "Author" line.
To build it, it will look at first for at the maintainer metadata and
use it if provided, then only at the author metadata.
This is not a correct behavior;
Two points:
1/ Distutils should not use the maintainer metadata to create the
*Author* line in the PKG-INFO
2/ We could add the extra "Maintainer" field in PKG-INFO,
I am all for 1/, but I am not sure for 2/. I never use the
Maintainer field my self.
Any opinions ?
Regards
Tarek
--
Tarek Ziadé | Association AfPy | www.afpy.org
Blog FR | http://programmation-python.org
Blog EN | http://tarekziade.wordpress.com/
