Distutils-SIG June 2015

distutils-sig@python.org

25 participants
31 discussions

ImportError running 'test' on namespace package - other package in namespace not found

by Jason R. Coombs

I've got two projects: mynamespace.myprojectA and mynamespace.myprojectB myprojectB depends on myprojectA. I'm using setuptools 0.6c8 to manage both projects. Both projects are registered using 'setup develop'. Both projects are accessible from an interactive interpreter: PS C:\Users\me\projects> python Python 2.5.2 (r252:60911, Feb 21 2008, 13:11:45) [MSC v.1310 32 bit (Intel)] on win32 Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. >>> import mynamespace.myprojectA >>> import mynamespace.myprojectB >>> from mynamespace.myprojectA import mymoduleZ However, when I run 'setup test' in myprojectB, the tests fail with File ".mymoduleZ.py", line NNN, in [some context] from mynamespace.myprojectA.mymoduleZ import MyClassC ImportError: No module named myprojectA.mymoduleZ In setup.py, the test_suite is nose.collector. I searched and couldn't find anyone else with this problem. Is this a supported configuration? Is there something I can do to make tests work with interdependent projects with the same root namespace? If there's not something obvious I should be doing differently, I'm happy to put together a minimal test case that reproduces the problem. Any suggestions are appreciated. Sincerely, Jason R. Coombs

1 year

Surviving a Compromise of PyPI - PEP 458 and 480

by Vladimir Diaz

Hello everyone, I am a research programmer at the NYU School of Engineering. My colleagues (Trishank Kuppusamy and Justin Cappos) and I are requesting community feedback on our proposal, "Surviving a Compromise of PyPI." The two-stage proposal can be reviewed online at: PEP 458 http://legacy.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0458/ PEP 480 http://legacy.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0480/ Summary of the Proposal: "Surviving a Compromise of PyPI" proposes how the Python Package Index (PyPI) can be amended to better protect end users from altered or malicious packages, and to minimize the extent of PyPI compromises against affected users. The proposed integration allows package managers such as pip to be more secure against various types of security attacks on PyPI and defend end users from attackers responding to package requests. Specifically, these PEPs describe how PyPI processes should be adapted to generate and incorporate repository metadata, which are signed text files that describe the packages and metadata available on PyPI. Package managers request (along with the packages) the metadata on PyPI to verify the authenticity of packages before they are installed. The changes to PyPI and tools will be minimal by leveraging a library, The Update Framework <https://github.com/theupdateframework/tuf>, that generates and transparently validates the relevant metadata. The first stage of the proposal (PEP 458 <http://legacy.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0458/>) uses a basic security model that supports verification of PyPI packages signed with cryptographic keys stored on PyPI, requires no action from developers and end users, and protects against malicious CDNs and public mirrors. To support continuous delivery of uploaded packages, PyPI administrators sign for uploaded packages with an online key stored on PyPI infrastructure. This level of security prevents packages from being accidentally or deliberately tampered with by a mirror or a CDN because the mirror or CDN will not have any of the keys required to sign for projects. The second stage of the proposal (PEP 480 <http://legacy.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0480/>) is an extension to the basic security model (discussed in PEP 458) that supports end-to-end verification of signed packages. End-to-end signing allows both PyPI and developers to sign for the packages that are downloaded by end users. If the PyPI infrastructure were to be compromised, attackers would be unable to serve malicious versions of these packages without access to the project's developer key. As in PEP 458, no additional action is required by end users. However, PyPI administrators will need to periodically (perhaps every few months) sign metadata with an offline key. PEP 480 also proposes an easy-to-use key management solution for developers, how to interface with a potential build farm on PyPI infrastructure, and discusses the security benefits of end-to-end signing. The second stage of the proposal simultaneously supports real-time project registration and developer signatures, and when configured to maximize security on PyPI, less than 1% of end users will be at risk even if an attacker controls PyPI and goes undetected for a month. We thank Nick Coghlan and Donald Stufft for their valuable contributions, and Giovanni Bajo and Anatoly Techtonik for their feedback. Thanks, PEP 458 & 480 authors.

1 year, 2 months

Upgrading dependencies

by Charlie Moad

Is it currently possible to upgrade dependencies as well when upgrading a packages? If not, this would be a really nice feature to add to easy_install. Maybe a call like: easy_install --upgrade --upgrade-deps Package Obviously it makes sense to leave this off by default. Thanks, Charlie

3 years

Changes to --find-links and --upgrade in SVN

by Phillip J. Eby

Elvelind Grandin reported a problem with the "develop" command that turned out to be a flaw in its --find-links support. Specifically, it wasn't ever processing the links. :) In the process of fixing it, I wound up cleaning up an annoying (to me, at least) quirk of the previous workings of --find-links. It used to be that find-links would always be processed first, no matter what, even if you were doing a completely local operation. This would've been especially annoying if it carried over into "develop", so I made some changes. Now, if an item passed to --find-links is local (a filename or file: URL), or a direct link to an egg or other distribution, it is indexed immediately. Remote URLs are now only retrieved if a dependency can't be resolved locally, or if you use the -U or --upgrade options (this goes for "develop" too). Note that this is a behavior change for easy_install, which was effectively treating --find-links as though you'd specified --upgrade in certain cases. So, if you're used to getting upgrades downloaded as a result of using --find-links, please note that this will no longer happen. EasyInstall will now *only* go online if a dependency can't be resolved locally, if -U or --upgrade is used, or if you provided suitable direct URLs via an argument or --find-links, or via a link in a local .html file.

3 years

Problems with svn in windows

by Sharky On PTNet

Hi, I´m trying to do "easy_install setuptools==dev" in a windows box but have an error with svn command. """... 'svn' is not recognized as an internal or external command, ...""" I have installed TortoiseSVN but it seems that don't have command line, is all with the Explorer. Can you tell me what client I may use in windows? Thanks for all, Helio Pereira Sharky @ PTNet

3 years

local development scenarios

by tgreenwood

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I'm new to distutils/and the egg system. I have not researched the archives as much as I should, so please excuse me if this is familiar territory... Q: Is it possible for dependency checks to work for non pipy deployed eggs? - A.egg - B.egg (setup_requires and install_requires A.egg) - email A and B eggs to friend - tell friend to : easy_install B - but B.egg does not install A...in fact, in my test case, it fails b/c it cannot find A in pipy - in this example, what happens if friend does not have net connection on target machine? how can they install from the eggs alone and get the dep checking to work? Q: How does my friend run the unittests on the egg that they have just installed? As I am developing, I frequently run the unittests and after every bdist_egg build, I also run the unit tests that way, too. How can the consumer do the same? Q: One of my apps is a command line app, say foo.py is a command line app that takes arg1, arg2,... How can the user run this app when it is encased in an egg? Q: How do I define my own pipy? While I like the idea of deploying there for the overall community, I don't want to send my half baked code into the wild. But I'd like to try the general functionality of having a deploy site for my beta customers. How can I set this up? Thanks in advance. - -Todd -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDl9Hfz6uXX4lQc/URAnY4AJ47DFHL/cpEltmqoUyGqzhsK5FjRACgt01v akc3Wh3IOXVv2jiS8TszhuE= =Rv/x -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

3 years

Choice of dependencies?

by John J Lee

Is it possible for a package to depend on one of several packages, with the user having the option to pick? For example, my package P might depend on package A, plus either package B or package C. I know I could (ab)use extras_require, but in my case this is a real dependency rather than an optional extra. The other option I have is to just pick one of the dependencies (B or C in my example above), and thereby force people to install it even though it's not strictly required. Neither option seems particularly attractive. John

3 years

setuptools doc patch

by John J Lee

The comma removed by the patch below implies that users working from a Subversion checkout should not use EasyInstall to periodically fetch the latest version. That's not what you intended to say, I assume? http://peak.telecommunity.com/DevCenter/setuptools You should also inform your users of the need to run this command, if they -are working from a Subversion checkout, rather than using EasyInstall to +are working from a Subversion checkout rather than using EasyInstall to periodically fetch the latest version. Hmm, probably much better than the patch above: -You should also inform your users of the need to run this command, if they -are working from a Subversion checkout, rather than using EasyInstall to -periodically fetch the latest version. +If your users are working from a Subversion checkout rather than using +EasyInstall, you should also inform them of the need to run this command +to periodically fetch the latest version. John

3 years

Re: [Distutils] distutils install probs on suse 9.0

by Mats Wichmann

At 05:43 AM 5/18/2004, David Handy wrote: >On Tue, 18 May 2004, Floris van der Tak wrote: > >> my attempt to install the distutils on suse 9.0 (which provides python >> 2.3) fails: > >Why are you installing distutils on a system that already has Python 2.3 >installed? Python 2.3 normally comes with distutils as part of the Python >standard library. > >Did suse distribute a version of Python that had distutils removed? It should come from python-devel

3 years

Sample setup.py for Numeric Python

by Greg Ward

Hi again -- [cc'd to Paul Dubois: you said you weren't following the distutils sig anymore, but this directly concerns NumPy and I'd like to get your input!] here's that sample setup.py for NumPy. See below for discussion (and questions!). ------------------------------------------------------------------------ #!/usr/bin/env python # Setup script example for building the Numeric extension to Python. # This does sucessfully compile all the .dlls. Nothing happens # with the .py files currently. # Move this file to the Numerical directory of the LLNL numpy # distribution and run as: # python numpysetup.py --verbose build_ext # # created 1999/08 Perry Stoll __rcsid__ = "$Id: numpysetup.py,v 1.1 1999/09/12 20:42:48 gward Exp $" from distutils.core import setup setup (name = "numerical", version = "0.01", description = "Numerical Extension to Python", url = "http://www.python.org/sigs/matrix-sig/", ext_modules = [ ( '_numpy', { 'sources' : [ 'Src/_numpymodule.c', 'Src/arrayobject.c', 'Src/ufuncobject.c' ], 'include_dirs' : ['./Include'], 'def_file' : 'Src/numpy.def' } ), ( 'multiarray', { 'sources' : ['Src/multiarraymodule.c'], 'include_dirs' : ['./Include'], 'def_file': 'Src/multiarray.def' } ), ( 'umath', { 'sources': ['Src/umathmodule.c'], 'include_dirs' : ['./Include'], 'def_file' : 'Src/umath.def' } ), ( 'fftpack', { 'sources': ['Src/fftpackmodule.c', 'Src/fftpack.c'], 'include_dirs' : ['./Include'], 'def_file' : 'Src/fftpack.def' } ), ( 'lapack_lite', { 'sources' : [ 'Src/lapack_litemodule.c', 'Src/dlapack_lite.c', 'Src/zlapack_lite.c', 'Src/blas_lite.c', 'Src/f2c_lite.c' ], 'include_dirs' : ['./Include'], 'def_file' : 'Src/lapack_lite.def' } ), ( 'ranlib', { 'sources': ['Src/ranlibmodule.c', 'Src/ranlib.c', 'Src/com.c', 'Src/linpack.c', ], 'include_dirs' : ['./Include'], 'def_file' : 'Src/ranlib.def' } ), ] ) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ First, what d'you think? Too clunky and verbose? Too much information for each extension? I kind of think so, but I'm not sure how to reduce it elegantly. Right now, the internal data structures needed to compile a module are pretty obviously exposed: is this a good thing? Or should there be some more compact form for setup.py that will be expanded later into the full glory we see above? I've already made one small step towards reducing the amount of cruft by factoring 'include_dirs' out and supplying it directly as a parameter to 'setup()'. (But that needs code not in the CVS archive yet, so I've left the sample setup.py the same for now.) The next thing I'd like to do is get that damn "def_file" out of there. To support it in MSVCCompiler, there's already an ugly hack that unnecessarily affects both the UnixCCompiler and CCompiler classes, and I want to get rid of that. (I refer to passing the 'build_info' dictionary into the compiler classes, if you're familiar with the code -- that dictionary is part of the Distutils extension-building system, and should not propagate into the more general compiler classes.) But I don't want to give these weird "def file" things standing on the order of source files, object files, libraries, etc., because they seem to me to be a bizarre artifact of one particular compiler, rather than something present in a wide range of C/C++ compilers. Based on the NumPy model, it seems like there's a not-too-kludgy way to handle this problem. Namely: if building extension "foo": if file "foo.def" found in same directory as "foo.c" add "/def:foo.def" to MSVC command line this will of course require some platform-specific code in the build_ext command class, but I figured that was coming eventually, so why put it off? ;-) To make this hack work with NumPy, one change would be necessary: rename Src/numpy.def to Src/_numpy.def to match Src/_numpy.c, which implements the _numpy module. Would this be too much to ask of NumPy? (Paul?) What about other module distributions that support MSVC++ and thus ship with "def" files? Could they be made to accomodate this scheme? Thanks for your feedback -- Greg -- Greg Ward - software developer gward(a)cnri.reston.va.us Corporation for National Research Initiatives 1895 Preston White Drive voice: +1-703-620-8990 Reston, Virginia, USA 20191-5434 fax: +1-703-620-0913

3 years

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

Distutils-SIG June 2015