Re: [Distutils] [Catalog-sig] Metadata-Version in PKG-INFO

hellos, Is it just me, or are these classifiers not as good as tags? Should people really have to discuss and get approved what tags they put on their software? Seems like a big waste of everyones time, and doesn't result in as good a database. cheers, 2009/4/17 Tarek Ziadé

2009/4/16 "Martin v. Löwis" :

...

...

I don't see it in the list (just LGPL without any version detail), I am ccing this request to catalog-sig so they can add it if they think it's wise

How should this be done? As a separate classifier with the suffix v3, or as a subclassifier of LGPL?

Looking at others (Mozilla Public License) I would go for a separate one with the suffix.

But what about LGPL 2 and 2.1 (It seems that 2.1 is introduces a lot of changes) ?

Maybe "LGPL2+" would be better for the 2.x series (and maybe 2+ includes v3 ?)

Maybe we could ask someone at the FSF so we have the best versions in our Trove classifier.

Regards Tarek

...

Regards, Martin

-- Tarek Ziadé | http://ziade.org _______________________________________________ Catalog-SIG mailing list Catalog-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/catalog-sig