hellos,

Is it just me, or are these classifiers not as good as tags?

Should people really have to discuss and get approved what tags they put on their software?

Seems like a big waste of everyones time, and doesn't result in as good a database.

cheers,


2009/4/17 Tarek Ziadé <ziade.tarek@gmail.com>
2009/4/16 "Martin v. Löwis" <martin@v.loewis.de>:
>> I don't see it in the list (just LGPL without any version detail), I
>> am ccing this request to catalog-sig so
>> they can add it if they think it's wise
>
> How should this be done? As a separate classifier with the suffix v3,
> or as a subclassifier of LGPL?
>

Looking at others (Mozilla Public License) I would go for a separate
one with the suffix.

But what about LGPL 2 and 2.1 (It seems that 2.1 is introduces a lot
of changes) ?

Maybe "LGPL2+" would be better for the 2.x series (and maybe 2+ includes v3 ?)

Maybe we could ask someone at the FSF so we have the best versions in
our Trove classifier.

Regards
Tarek

> Regards,
> Martin
>



--
Tarek Ziadé | http://ziade.org
_______________________________________________