On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 11:15 AM Donald Stufft donald@stufft.io wrote:


> On May 10, 2016, at 11:00 AM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis@pitrou.net> wrote:
>
> (as an aside, if there's the question of forking an existing parser
> implementation for better vendorability, forking a YAML parser may be
> more useful to third-party folks than forking a TOML parser :-))


I’m seeing what I can come up with (https://github.com/dstufft/yaml) though
I don’t know that I feel like actually maintaining whatever it is I end up
figuring out there.

Did you intend to fork from https://github.com/yaml/pyyaml? I believe the latest PyYAML is actually hosted on BitBucket:

https://bitbucket.org/xi/pyyaml/

Also, a better starting point than PyYAML may be this existing fork of the library, ruamel.yaml:

https://bitbucket.org/ruamel/yaml

The fork makes several changes which may be relevant to you.

Nick