On Dec 23, 2014, at 3:55 AM, Chris Jerdonek email@example.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 12:44 AM, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
Why the jump from 1.5.6 to 6.0?
The release notes say (under "6.0"):
"PROCESS Version numbers are now simply X.Y where the leading 1 has been dropped."
I'm guessing this is to start honoring the convention (e.g. from semver) that backwards incompatible changes should only be made when the major version number is incremented.
Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
It’s a mixture of things.
* We don’t generally have massive breaking releases, we tend to deprecate things over time and remove them a few versions later. This means that each 1.X+1 broke something that worked in 1.X.
* There was an allure to do a big "2.0" style breakage that this completely negates.
* Given the first item, what to do for the version after 1.9 was a question, we could just do 1.10 but given we didn't want to do a big 2.0 style breakage and we didn't have any plans to increment the 1, we'd likely just keep doing 1.X+1 for a very long time.
--- Donald Stufft PGP: 7C6B 7C5D 5E2B 6356 A926 F04F 6E3C BCE9 3372 DCFA