On Tuesday, November 13, 2012 at 11:31 AM, a.cavallo@cavallinux.eu wrote:
+1Distutils is good enough: it could be better but for what is required(essentially copying files and creating packages installers) is fine. The onlycorner case is an absolute pain in the neck is in the cross compile scenario.Currently I don't have *any* need for "auto" tools (setuptools and descendants).As an example I always advice to avoid like a plague anything that depends onsetuptools... with all the due respect I think is the poor's developer attempt toplay the sys admin game.Even virtual env is a poor work around on the python interpreter not beingrelocatable (as in a portable app fashion).thanksOn Tue 13/11/12 16:10, "Ronald Oussoren" ronaldoussoren@mac.com wrote:On 13 Nov, 2012, at 16:00, Daniel Holth <dholth@gmail.com> wrote:I want to remove distutils from the standardlibrary.Why? Distutils may not be perfect, but is usable for basic packages. Itcould even be enhanced to support these peps and be even more useable,although patches for that would run into the self-imposed freeze ofdistutils development.Ronald_______________________________________________Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org_______________________________________________Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org