On 9/13/12 3:21 AM, SAn wrote:
On Wed Sep 12 19:47:39 CEST 2012, Donald Stufft wrote:
That said, this doesn't match my workflow at all. After releasing "1.0" the next version is going to be "1.1", and any development pre-release will be "1.1.devX". "1.1a" might not ever even exist. I think others brought up this critique at the time PEP 386 was being discussed, but then nothing was ever done about it >_> Yea, this concerned me because 1.1.devX < 1.1a1 < 1.1b1 < 1.1c1 < 1.1 is how i've seen it used in the wild. Looks like most everyone i've seen using it so far has been doing it wrong. Don't think ive seen a single
On Wednesday, September 12, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Erik Bray wrote: person do it right. Hi, just yesterday i got bitten by this issue. FYI:
# verlib "pep386" (from https://bitbucket.org/tarek/distutilsversion) you should use the one at http://hg.python.org/distutils2/file/0291648eb2b2/distutils2/version.py
for all your tests, and file bugs at bugs.python.org verlib is an old version and is properly a bit different Cheers Tarek