On 26-03-12 13:41, Jim Fulton wrote:
Does anyone have any objections to renaming the project "buildout"? I expect that most existing recipes would work with the new buildout. Recipes that import zc.buildout (zc.buildout.easy_install) would be broken. Those recipes would be likely to be broken by changes we'd make (like omissions of the new 1.5-based APIs) anyway.
Rename is fine with me.
And if needed we can mock a zc.buildout inside it to help with moving over, I'd guess.