Vladimir Diaz wrote:
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Nick Coghlan email@example.com wrote:
On 23 December 2014 at 01:46, Vladimir Diaz firstname.lastname@example.org wrote: ::ping:: Has anyone in the community gotten a chance to review PEP 458 and/or PEP 480? Community feedback would be appreciated. Sorry about that Vladimir - I think the main PyPA devs have been focused on getting PEP 440 implemented, and the associated setuptools, pip and virtualenv updates out the door, and now we're into the end of year holiday period for many of us. Considering that the previous drafts of PEP 458 generated quite a bit of
feedback and questions, I was surprised by the lack of responses this time around (almost relieved :).
That's due to a difference in audiences. This mailing list is very much skewed towards packaging folks, while the Packaging category on discuss.python.org gets more people tangentially interested in packaging versus heavily focused on it, so the type of people you will engage with will vary in the two areas.