On 19 January 2018 at 00:14, Joni Orponen
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 5:58 AM, Nick Coghlan
wrote: Given that, I think it would be reasonable to finally Withdraw PEP 426 (rather than continuing to defer it), and have PEP 566 define metadata version 2.1, so that it's unambiguously the latest metadata version.
Jump straight to 3.0 to clear out any confusion and/or ambiguity on the next backwards-incompatible one?
While we could do that, wheel's use of "2.0" actually stems from early drafts of PEP 426, and PEP 566 *is* backwards compatible with that. So I like 2.1 - higher than everything previously used, but an incremental update to the early versions of 426 before we/I started imagining a ground up redesign of the metadata definition. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia