I prefer docs. It seems more natural.<br><br>Michael<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 21 September 2010 11:35, anatoly techtonik <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:techtonik@gmail.com">techtonik@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">Hi,<br>
<br>
I see that distutils2 promotes storing documentation in docs/<br>
directory while Python sources use Doc/<br>
I&#39;d like to see this changed before distutils2 is released beta.<br>
<br>
In my projects checkouts there are 80 project that use doc/<br>
directories. Among these are:<br>
- subversion<br>
- hg<br>
- sphinx<br>
- trac<br>
- scons<br>
- twisted<br>
<br>
docs/ directory is used by 61 project, the most famous are:<br>
- xalan<br>
- fop<br>
- moinmoin<br>
- cmd2<br>
- googlecl<br>
<br>
<br>
There are some arguments for &#39;doc/&#39;:<br>
1. there is no plural for &#39;documentation&#39;<br>
2. bin/ is a common name for storing executables, although there is<br>
plural for &#39;binary&#39;<br>
3. we still use src/ instead of sources/<br>
<br>
Any thoughts/objections?<br>
<font color="#888888">--<br>
anatoly t.<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Distutils-SIG maillist  -  <a href="mailto:Distutils-SIG@python.org">Distutils-SIG@python.org</a><br>
<a href="http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig" target="_blank">http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig</a><br>
</font></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><a href="http://www.voidspace.org.uk">http://www.voidspace.org.uk</a><br><br><br>