On 17 Jan 2014 23:22, "Matthew Iversen" <teh.ivo@gmail.com> wrote:
On 17/01/14 13:52, Hannes Schmidt wrote:
I read through the "Removing dependency_links" thread [1] and I beg you
The mentioned thread indicates that research was done to gauge the
Another misconception seem to be that dependency_links is predominantly
used for installing patched or customized versions of dependencies hosted on PyPI. I'm pretty sure the predominant use case for dependency_links is with projects that are hosted privately, e.g. for an organization's internal use. I represent such an organization and removing dependency_links would impact us negatively. We host a set of internal
I understand the motivation for this change – security – but there must
be smarter way to handle it. Could we fallback to dependency_links if a PyPI lookup isn't successful? Could we restrict dependency_links to links
not follow through with the deprecation and removal of dependency_links and to rethink your approach. popularity of the dependency_links in publicly hosted Python projects. That approach is fundamentally flawed: Publicly hosted projects are much more likely to also be available on PyPI than private, closed-source projects. Consequently, their dependencies are also more likely to be hosted on PyPI as well. Because of that, they are much less likely to rely on the dependency_links feature. projects and their dependencies on Bitbucket and we rely on dependency_links to install them directly from there. that share a prefix with the link from which the package is currently being installed? A combination of the two?
[1]:
https://mail.python.org/pipermail/distutils-sig/2013-October/022937.html
-- Hannes Schmidt Software Application Developer Data Migration Engineer Cancer Genomics Hub University of California, Santa Cruz
(206) 696-2316 (cell) hannes@ucsc.edu
_______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
Are you aware that you can also provide a solid infrastructure for a "proprietary environment of packages" by hosting your own private pypi mirror?
There are quite a few projects that enable this, such as
https://pypi.python.org/pypi/pypiserver
https://pypi.python.org/pypi/mypypi
https://github.com/steiza/simplepypi
http://djangopypi2.readthedocs.org/en/latest/
You can use the -i flag, or a .pypirc config file to tell pip to look at your own private index instead of the official one; or direct it to use the official pypi only after looking at your private pypi.
You can also host a network-available folder of wheels for pip to find, or simply a http accessible folder of packages as Donald suggested.
Private PyPI mirrors and internal hosting options would be a suitable advanced topic for the PUG. I don't recall whether or not Marcus already added a placeholder for it, though. Cheers, Nick.
-- Matt Iversen PGP: 0xc046e8a874522973 // 2F04 3DCC D6E6 D5AC D262 2E0B C046 E8A8 7452
2973
_______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig