On 7 May 2016 at 08:21, Paul Moore <p.f.moore@gmail.com> wrote:
On 6 May 2016 at 19:14, Brett Cannon <brett@python.org> wrote:
OK, assuming the Nick will be pronouncing, who wants to write the PEP?
... and if Nick doesn't want to pronounce, I'm willing to offer to be BDFL for this one. But a PEP is the first thing. (And IMO the key point of the PEP is to be very clear on what is in scope and what isn't - the discussions have covered a *lot* of ground and being clear on what's excluded will be at least as important as stating what's in scope).
Answering this specifically: I'm happy to be the arbiter-of-consensus for this one, as my schedule's pretty clear right now (at least until I head to PyCon US on the 27th). Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia