I accept PEP 566. Thank you for doing this work.
Daniel
On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 5:05 PM Dustin Ingram <di@di.codes> wrote:
I've updated the PEP to include the message body as Description.
https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0566/
I don't think there are any other outstanding issues, so this should
be ready for Daniel's review.
Thanks,
D.
On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 2:09 PM, Trishank Kuppusamy
<trishank.kuppusamy@datadoghq.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 2:19 PM, Daniel Holth <dholth@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hashes do not belong in this PEP, which is intended to do just a little
>> more than document the status quo. The document does provide for future
>> enhancements to the spec without using the PEP process.
>>
>> Personally I am not a fan of putting concrete requirements or hashes of
>> specific archives at this level.
>
>
> Fair enough, just throwing the idea out there!
>
> _______________________________________________
> Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
>
_______________________________________________
Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig