On 03/06/2013 08:13, Donald Stufft wrote:
If a reasonably active project doesn't have anything to show after six months, I think we have different definitions of 'reasonably active'.
...or different definitions of 'software quality' ;-)
Seriously, I don't think anyone would argue that we have enough nested list printers in this world or that a package without any contact details or description is fair game to delete, but I must echo what others have said in that a unilateral process where a project is deleted without the owner being given a reasonable time to respond doesn't seem like a good idea.
Unless I missed it I don't think I've seen *anyone* suggest that projects where the authors appear to actually have plans to use the name have the name yanked out from underneath them.
...in that case, I'm happy to find out I have misunderstood :-) Chris -- Simplistix - Content Management, Batch Processing & Python Consulting - http://www.simplistix.co.uk