On 2017-06-01 21:09:57 -0400 (-0400), Donald Stufft wrote: [...]
I think a separate tool for each of these roles is somewhat user unfriendly TBH. [...]
I'll do my best not to be offended that you don't consider me a user (or representative of some broader class of users). ;) At any rate, I think it depends on your definition of users. Some users want one shiny kitchen-sink tool that does everything for them, others want composable tools with well-considered bounds of operation. It's possible a modular approach could satisfy both, but then again if twine grows too many features I'm just as likely to write a new lightweight API client instead so I can have something auditable I can trust my credentials to which only knows how to upload. -- Jeremy Stanley