Hello, The proposal has been posted to peps@python.org : http://hg.python.org/peps/file/52767ab7e140/pep-0423.txt I am about to post it to python-dev@python.org for discussion and review. In order to complete the move, I plan to replace the document by references to PEP 423 in packaging section of cpython documentation. See also http://bugs.python.org/issue14899 Benoit Le 19/06/2012 23:49, Benoît Bryon a écrit :
Hi,
Le 06/06/2012 10:52, Benoît Bryon a écrit :
Le 31/05/2012 18:00, PJ Eby a écrit :
You've definitely put in a lot of work on this, and most of the actual guidelines in your PEP are quite good. I think there's a core part of this that can and should be a good Informational-track PEP.
If it actually becomes a draft PEP, I guess we should:
* move the document in PEPs' repository * add notes in Python packaging documentation to reference the PEP.
Updated https://bitbucket.org/benoitbryon/cpython/src/doc-package-names/Doc/packagin... Prepared migration to a PEP. I am to submit the document for review at peps@python.org. Feedback is welcome!
Le 06/06/2012 10:52, Benoît Bryon a écrit :
Also, I propose to shorten or move the "terminology" section in another document (another pep or in packaging documentation):
* it would simplify the document * we'd better share the terminology between several documents.
Moved terminology section to packaging/introduction.rst. See https://bitbucket.org/benoitbryon/cpython/changeset/5eca478e6804#chg-Doc/pac...
Benoit _______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig