April 21, 2016
9:24 p.m.
On 4/21/2016 15:02, Chris Barker wrote:
Good evidence that the "first come first served, and then you get to keep it forever" is not ideal.
Criminal violations of trademark are evidence that its not ideal, and therefor we should make pypi untrustworthy for all other cases? This case is /criminal/ violation of trademarks. This is different than 'I have a package that hasn't been updated for a year and you want my name on pypi'.