Nov. 28, 2009
7:55 a.m.
"P.J. Eby" <pje@telecommunity.com> writes:
At 12:26 PM 11/28/2009 +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
My understanding of PEP 386 is that it *isn't* about asking Python developers to change how they work. Is that not right?
Asking them to generate alternative versioning schemes, without the ability to use pre-release versions (e.g. alpha, beta, etc.) would most certainly be a change from the status quo.
We seem to be talking entirely past each other; I can't see how to relate what I wrote to your reply. -- \ “Programs must be written for people to read, and only | `\ incidentally for machines to execute.” —Abelson & Sussman, | _o__) _Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs_ | Ben Finney