On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 2:32 PM, Sebastien Douche <sdouche@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 13:49, Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de> wrote:
> announcing a fork without any objective? what is this fork about?

Python community *must* have a robust, stable and well featured
infrastructure like Cpan, Gem or Apt. The actual situation is insane:

- Setuptools is not on Python core

I agree this is a shame. The boundary between setuptools and distutils is fuzzy.
But if we build together a good tool, I guess it will be included at some point
as a distutils replacement.
 

- single point failure infrastructure (pypi.p.o)

notice that there's a patch at this point that let setuptools use several indexes,
it will be discussed for inclusion in Distribute 0.3
 

- not compatible with Hg / Bzr / Git out of the box

Notice that you can write a Manifest.in file to avoid it at this point
 

- missing some features


As far I see, the goal is to speed up the development of a great tool,
not just a fork for fun :).

exactly !
 


PS: within 1 month, Ubuntu 8.10 & Debian 4.2 are out (default svn :
1.5). It's not acceptable to say "use trunk version, stupid!"


--
Seb
_______________________________________________
Distutils-SIG maillist  -  Distutils-SIG@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig



--
Tarek Ziadé | Association AfPy | www.afpy.org
Blog FR | http://programmation-python.org
Blog EN | http://tarekziade.wordpress.com/