On 05/29/2012 08:19 AM, PJ Eby wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Erik Bray <email@example.com
I'm confused by this statement. distutils2 _includes_ a package manager
> This particular solution works for me. But the point is that it can
> be done pretty easily. However, the lack of a setup_requires-like
> feature still makes things pretty impossible short of shipping a copy
> of all the required setup hooks with the projects that use them.
> Certainly doable, but far from ideal.
> Right, and I don't think distutils2 can really add setup_requires
> without blessing a package manager.