On 26 May 2016 at 01:11, Thomas Güttler
Am 25.05.2016 um 15:52 schrieb Nick Coghlan:
On 25 May 2016 at 17:13, Thomas Güttler
If you want wheel to be successful, **provide a build server**.
Thomas, aside from that statement being demonstrably untrue (since the wheel format has already proven to be wildly successful, even with developers coping with Linux ABI fragmentation), an attitude of "give me more free stuff, or your project will fail" is not an acceptable tone to adopt on this list.
The contributors here are (mainly) volunteers working on infrastructure provided by a public interest charity, not your personal servants to be ordered about as you feel inclined.
You seem to be angry. Why?
Thomas, I am pointing out that your current exhibition of entitled behaviour across multiple venues (as represented by the specific sentence I quoted) is problematic. Please stop trying to crack the whip and generate an artificial sense of urgency - software publication and distribution is a complex problem, and most of the current challenges in the PyPI ecosystem stem from an ongoing lack of funding which requires organisational change moreso than technical change. While various folks are working on that, it's mostly not a distutils-sig level problem, but rather a question for the PSF and for commercial Python redistributors. If you're looking to provide information, or ask if a particular solution that seems obvious to you would be feasible in practice, then do that. The one thing I am asking you to STOP doing is combining your questions with exaggerated hyperbole that's designed to make volunteers feel bad. Regards, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | email@example.com | Brisbane, Australia