On 7 May 2016 at 08:21, Paul Moore <p.f.moore@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 6 May 2016 at 19:14, Brett Cannon <brett@python.org> wrote:
>> OK, assuming the Nick will be pronouncing, who wants to write the PEP?
>
> ... and if Nick doesn't want to pronounce, I'm willing to offer to be
> BDFL for this one. But a PEP is the first thing. (And IMO the key
> point of the PEP is to be very clear on what is in scope and what
> isn't - the discussions have covered a *lot* of ground and being clear
> on what's excluded will be at least as important as stating what's in
> scope).

Answering this specifically: I'm happy to be the arbiter-of-consensus
for this one, as my schedule's pretty clear right now (at least until
I head to PyCon US on the 27th).