On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 8:36 AM, Pradyun Gedam <pradyunsg@gmail.com> wrote:Hello List!
I feel it’s fine to hold back the other changes for later but the
upgrade-strategy change should get shipped out to the world as quickly as
possible. Even how the change is exposed the user can also be discussed later.What do you mean by "ship" if you say the behavior can still be changed later?
I request the list members to focus on only the change of the default
upgrade strategy to be non-eager.Does anyone have any concerns regarding the change of the default upgrade
strategy to be non-eager? If not, let’s get just that shipped out as soon as possible.The concerns were always with how to change it
one of:(1) add "pip upgrade"(2) change behavior of "pip install --upgrade"(3) change behavior of "pip install"Your sentence above suggests you're asking for agreement on (2), but I think you want agreement on (3) right? At least that was the conclusion of your PEP-style writeup.
Personally I don't have a preference anymore, as long as a choice is made so we don't remain stuck where we are now.Ralf