Yay! Thanks everyone involved, especially Donald and Nick.
On 22 October 2013 23:05, Nick Coghlan firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
For those distutils-sig residents that don't follow python-dev, a certain PEP was formally accepted today :)
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: "Martin v. Löwis" email@example.com Date: 22 October 2013 19:33 Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 453 (ensurepip) updated To: Nick Coghlan firstname.lastname@example.org, "email@example.com" firstname.lastname@example.org
Am 20.10.13 14:27, schrieb Nick Coghlan:
I have posted the latest version of PEP 453 to python.org.
This version looks good to me, and I accept it for inclusion in Python 3.4.
I'd like to thank Nick for carefully editing this PEP, and I'd like to cite it as an archetype for a well-written PEP. It's very precise, and it elaborates on rejected proposals and the motivation for rejection.
I'd also like to thank Donald for pushing this, and for continued work on the implementation of the PEP. I see that this all took longer than expected (also due to my fault in providing timely reviews). I suggest that some of the stuff that needs to be done still is delegated, so that Donald doesn't have to do all of it.
-- Nick Coghlan | email@example.com | Brisbane, Australia _______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig