On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 05:07:01PM +0100, Tarek Ziadé wrote:
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 12:28 PM, Floris Bruynooghe <floris.bruynooghe@gmail.com> wrote:
This is an important point. I tought the aim of PEP 386 was to create a version scheme that can represent every version number developers want to express, not to create one that allows everyones favourite syntax.
Absolutely,
Maybe worth explaining this in the abstract of the motivation of the PEP to focus discussion? Otherwise I reckon chances are pretty high that the syntax flameware will flare up again when this gets proposed on python-dev (or here if there's need for another round).
So If the current proposal works for all cases (e.g. people can translate their schemes into PEP 386 one), I am proposing to: [...]
+1, I think that's a good approach (+0 on the aliases part though) Floris -- Debian GNU/Linux -- The Power of Freedom www.debian.org | www.gnu.org | www.kernel.org